His-tags lighten up and lose their inhibitions.

T he ability to control molecular behavior in the four dimensions of time and space is almost uniquely afforded by light. Consequently, there has been a long history of the use of light to trigger molecular interactions in the study of biological phenomena or the creation of active biomolecules (1). One application of this principle has been in the fabrication of protein microarrays, a subset of the field of protein biochips (2), broadly defined as proteins immobilized on flat surfaces. The report by Grunwald et al. (3) provides a significant advance in the spatially defined immobilization of proteins on surfaces. It accomplishes this task using a novel paradigm for photochemical activation: Binding sites on the surface recognize a ligand on the proteins to be immobilized but also carry that ligand themselves. It competes with and inhibits protein binding, so the protein can only be bound once the competing ligand has been released via irradiation (Fig. 1). This autoinhibition strategy offers advantages over past methods for iterative, spatially directed protein immobilization, both in the size of the protein features that can be created and the specificity (that is, signal/background) with which this can be done. Any protein microarray technology needs to exploit a broad-based method to link proteins to the surface to enhance the accessibility of the technology. Wellknown methods used to immobilize proteins on surfaces such as Biacore chips, like N-hydroxysuccinimide active esters, are not relevant for microarrays when they are not site-selective. Typically, an affinity tag is added to the protein that is recognized by a complementary binding partner on the surface. Protein microarrays have been fabricated using a variety of ligand pairs, including azide-alkyne click chemistry, double-stranded DNA hybridization, and avidin–biotin interactions. An appealing feature of the Grunwald et al. (3) study is the use of the widely available Histag system, where an immobilized metal ion recognizes an oligo-His affinity tag introduced into a protein using genetic engineering. The Ni-NTA (nitrilotriacetic acid)·oligo-His complex can be reversed by the addition of imidazole or EDTA. In this work, the binding strength of the complex is enhanced by a multivalent head group (4) that uses three nickel ions to bind the oligo-His affinity-tagged protein. In the postgenomic era, DNA microarrays have been key contributors to systematic investigations of nucleic acidbased phenomena, such as gene expression, mutations, and single-nucleotide polymorphisms. They have whetted scientists’ appetites to interrogate proteinbased phenomena such as posttranslational modifications or protein–protein interactions in the same massively parallel fashion, which has been achieved in only a few cases. The immobilization of 5,800 His-tagged yeast proteins to screen for interactions with other proteins could be performed on an Ni-NTA microarray surface using spotting technology, for example (5). Fabricating microarrays that are sufficiently miniaturized to address larger proteomes poses a far greater challenge, and protein microarrays have not met the challenge despite concerted efforts (6). It has been possible to create microscopic or nanoscopic protein domains using photolithographic microfabrication, soft lithography, or nanotechnology methods. Past work has patterned NTA for protein immobilization on chips using microcontact printing (in domains of 10 μm) (4, 7) and nanoimprint lithography (in domains of 500 nm) (8). However, it has been a far more difficult task to iterate such processes to selectively immobilize a large number of different proteins (i.e., step and repeat). An important distinction between protein arrays and DNA microarray technology is that, for the latter, in situ synthesis permits multiple bonding events to occur in parallel, whereas for the former, it is essential that each protein be independently and sequentially immobilized. Methods of siteselective protein immobilization that rely on physical delivery either generate impractically large domains or cannot be used in step-and-repeat sequences. Ideally, protein microarrays could be prepared via iterative light-based assembly (9), because light offers the advantage that the domains of individual proteins that can be fabricated are in the size range of 10–50 μm (related to the near-UV light wavelength), much smaller than the physical delivery techniques (spotting, jetting) that can be iterated. Until the methodology of Grunwald et al. (3), such a capability had not been demonstrated. Key to any protein microarray fabrication method is control of surface regions activated for protein immobilization while inhibiting reactions on the vast majority of the surface that should not be activated. The greater the contrast between these two regions, the more effective will be the site discrimination in protein immobilization and the greater the number of unique protein regions that can be fabricated. The distinguishing feature of the Grunwald approach to this problem is that the inhibition is not based on a specific chemical modification of Fig. 1. Cartoon of the light-directed immobilization of a His-tagged protein on a microarray using the autoinhibition method. An undecapeptide construct (green) is created with a nickel-tris-(nitrilotriacetic acid) multivalent head group (nickel-tris-NTA) at the N terminus and a His-tag at the C terminus. Included within the peptide sequence is the photocleavable amino acid 3-amino-3-(2-nitrophenyl)-propionic acid and a single Cys for attachment of the construct to a microarray (or other molecules, in further applications). Initially, the construct is in the autoinhibited state. Irradiation (280–400 nm) cleaves the backbone of the construct and treatment with a competing ligand (imidazole) disrupts the intramolecular self-inactivation. Removal of the autoinhibitory His-tag opens up the nickel-tris-NTA head group for binding of His-tagged proteins.